Which of the following is an example of good practice during a bomb threat response?

Designating a meeting point far from the threat is an important aspect of responding to a bomb threat because it ensures the safety of individuals who may be in immediate danger. This practice helps to establish a clear and safe location for evacuation, reducing panic and confusion among those affected by the threat. A pre-determined meeting point can facilitate accountability by enabling incident managers to quickly assess who has evacuated and who may still be at risk.

Choosing a meeting point that is far from the potential danger zone allows for an organized and efficient evacuation, minimizing exposure to potential harm. It also reassures staff and emergency personnel that there is a plan in place, which can help maintain order during what is likely a chaotic situation.

Other choices, while potentially relevant to certain scenarios, do not align with standard emergency response practices and may put individuals at greater risk.