Which of the following is NOT a measure to help protect an organization from a bomb incident?

In the realm of crisis management and bomb threat protocols, the focus is primarily on protective measures that enhance the safety and security of the organization and its employees. Increased marketing efforts do not have any direct correlation with enhancing security or reducing the risks associated with bomb incidents.

Good workplace practices contribute to developing a culture of safety where employees are aware of potential threats, including bomb threats. These practices might involve regular training and awareness programs regarding identifying suspicious activities or items.

Access control is a fundamental aspect of security that involves regulating who can enter or leave the premises. This measure is crucial in preventing unauthorized access, which could potentially mitigate the risks of a bomb incident.

Defendants in depth, while not immediately clear, may refer to thorough investigations or screenings of individuals accessing a facility. This could also contribute to a comprehensive safety strategy.

In essence, while good workplace practices, access control, and thorough investigative measures work to enhance the overall safety protocols of an organization, increased marketing efforts do not play a role in protective strategies against bomb incidents. This disconnect makes it the correct identification in this context.