Which of the following is NOT a component of the "all-hazards" approach?

The "all-hazards" approach is designed to prepare for a wide range of potential emergencies, rather than focusing on specific threats or disaster scenarios. It emphasizes the importance of developing general strategies that can be applied across various situations, which is why mitigation strategies, preparation for diverse emergencies, and coordination among agencies are integral components.

Mitigation strategies involve preemptive actions taken to reduce the severity of potential disasters, making them essential for any all-hazards plan. Preparation for diverse emergencies means training and readiness measures are developed to handle different types of crises, reinforcing the plan's versatility. Coordination among agencies ensures that resources and responses are unified and comprehensive, enhancing the effectiveness of any emergency response effort.

In contrast, specific disaster scenarios limit the approach to defined situations, which can potentially overlook other unforeseen hazards. This focus on unique scenarios diverges from the primary strength of the all-hazards approach, which is its broad applicability across varying emergencies. This distinction is vital for effective crisis management, making the inclusion of only specific scenarios a deviation from the core principle of being prepared for any crisis.